Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * Raphael Hertzog (hertzog(at)debian(dot)org) wrote:
>> Still I believe that this issue should be fixed in both sides. It's not
>> smart from PostgreSQL to call fsync() when it has not made any change.
> Why?
My thought about this is just to ignore EINVAL when fsync'ing a directory,
as we already do with EBADF.
regards, tom lane