Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6
Date: 2019-05-06 03:56:58
Message-ID: 1105.1557115018@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2019-05-04 11:04:07 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I don't think we discussed exactly what "come out" means. My thought is
>> to leave the test scripts in place (so they can be invoked manually with
>> EXTRA_TESTS) but remove them from the schedule files.

> Yea, that sounds sensible. I'll do so by tonight if you don't beat me to
> it.

On this coast, "tonight" is running into "tomorrow" ... you planning
to do that soon?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-05-06 03:58:53 Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-05-06 03:44:47 Re: Fixing order of resowner cleanup in 12, for Windows