Re: [HACKERS] Bgwriter behavior

On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 20:09, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> OK, we have a submitted patch that attempts to improve bgwriter by
> making bgwriter_percent control what percentage of the buffer is
> scanned.
>
> The patch still needs doc changes and a change to the default value but
> at this point we need a vote on the patch. Is it:
>
> * too late for 8.0
> * not the right improvement
> * to be applied with doc/default additions
>
> Comments?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-01-01 at 17:47, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2005-01-01 at 17:01, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Well, I think we're saying: its not in 8.0 now, and we take our time to
> > > > > consider patches for 8.1 and accept the situation that the parameter
> > > > > names/meaning will change in next release.
> > > >

I hear veto ... so the above situation stands then: 8.1 it is.

Not unhappy...I want this thing released as much as the next man...

--
Best Regards, Simon Riggs