| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Mike Palmiotto <mike(dot)palmiotto(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql |
| Date: | 2017-04-06 15:29:58 |
| Message-ID: | 11037.1491492598@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> I'm going to push the attached in a few hours unless there is any
> additional discussion. As stated above we'll do the regression changes
> in a separate patch once that is sorted. I used Tom's approach and
> comment wording for 0001a.
Looks generally sane, but I noticed a grammatical nitpick:
- * Only attributes within regular relation or partition relations have
+ * Only attributes within regular relations or partition relations have
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-04-06 15:33:16 | Re: Uninitialized variable introduced in 3217327053638085d24dd4d276e7c1f7ac2c4c6b |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-04-06 15:21:52 | Re: No-op case in ExecEvalConvertRowtype |