Re: merging advocacy and "overview"

On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 13:03, Omar Kilani wrote:
> Josh Berkus said the following on 2/12/2004 12:39 PM:
> > Robert,
> >
> >>the only reason to go with advocacy is due to it's replacing
> >>advocacy.postgresql.org; ie. it's a community standard vs. industry
> >>standard.
> >
> >
> > Sure. However, I'm more concerned about the public & press being able to find
> > things than long-term community members, who can always ask on IRC. "About"
> > is instantly understandable to web users; "Advocacy" is not.
> >
> > So, an example of "About", a la Omar:
> > http://postgresql.tinysofa.com/about/casestudies
> >
> > I think this works.
>
> Additionally, we've already restructured and pretty much finished the
> whole site. And see no reason why it can't be in for the 15th of December.
>

I see a number of things that need to changed, but nothing that seems
like a complete deal breaker. Omar, how long would it take you to work
up some patches for the work you have done?

Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL