| From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: nodeAgg perf tweak |
| Date: | 2004-12-01 04:29:47 |
| Message-ID: | 1101875387.22124.104.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 23:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> And how badly does it leak memory? I do not believe this patch is
> tenable.
Did you read the rest of my mail?
> Something that occurred to me the other morning in the shower is that we
> could trivially inline MemoryContextSwitchTo() when using gcc, much as
> you did for list_length(). I haven't gotten around to doing it but it
> seems like a free percent-or-two improvement.
Yeah, it actually occurred to me as well this would be worth doing. It's
not relevant to this particular example though.
-Neil
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-12-01 04:29:56 | Re: libpq and psql not on same page about SIGPIPE |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-12-01 04:15:34 | Re: nodeAgg perf tweak |