Re: Anyone got time to review an article?

From: Tom Copeland <tom(at)infoether(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Anyone got time to review an article?
Date: 2004-11-24 14:32:20
Message-ID: 1101306740.8976.1.camel@hal
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 13:40, Michael Paesold wrote:
> What I found quite irritating is that the forum posts below ("PostgreSQL
> Forum") are not about PostgreSQL but really MS SQL, i.e. the MS SQL forum is
> linked into this article. If you look at the available database forums, you
> will see that there is no PostgreSQL forum (but e.g. a MySQL one).
>
> Perhaps you can point that out to the Databasejournal people so the would
> fix it.

There's a PostgreSQL forum up now:

http://forums.databasejournal.com/forumdisplay.php?s=53f8cab16be0ade340079ed45a58c270&forumid=2

Thanks for the suggestion,

Tom

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Copeland 2004-11-24 14:35:23 Re: Anyone got time to review an article?
Previous Message Vishal Kashyap @ [SaiHertz] 2004-11-24 14:30:25 Re: Anyone willing to chat to someone as a postgresql reference?