| From: | Tom Copeland <tom(at)infoether(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Anyone got time to review an article? |
| Date: | 2004-11-23 18:51:22 |
| Message-ID: | 1101235882.20680.193.camel@hal |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 13:40, Michael Paesold wrote:
> Tom Copeland wrote:
>
> > This article is up here now:
> >
> > http://databasejournal.com/features/postgresql/article.php/3437821
> >
> > Thanks to Merlin Moncure and Robert Bernier for their helpful
> > suggestions, and long live PostgreSQL!
> What I found quite irritating is that the forum posts below ("PostgreSQL
> Forum") are not about PostgreSQL but really MS SQL, i.e. the MS SQL forum is
> linked into this article. If you look at the available database forums, you
> will see that there is no PostgreSQL forum (but e.g. a MySQL one).
>
> Perhaps you can point that out to the Databasejournal people so the would
> fix it.
Good catch, I've dropped them a line, thanks!
> I liked your article.
Thanks!
Yours,
Tom
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-11-24 04:39:46 | Re: Anyone got time to review an article? |
| Previous Message | Michael Paesold | 2004-11-23 18:40:31 | Re: Anyone got time to review an article? |