Re: Proposal for change in pgsql-announce behavior

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal for change in pgsql-announce behavior
Date: 2006-10-30 01:35:41
Message-ID: 10f261919bf91769a84f0acc0a7d318c@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> 'k, the reply-to is easy ... the auto-unsubscribe *alot* harder ... there is an
> 'interface' for Mj2 that might allow for this, if someone feels up to writing
> the perl hook to do it ...

I think the reply-to is enough for now. The list already gets its fair share of
"please unsubscribe" messages requiring manual intervention. A few more, going
to the mods instead of the sender, probably won't matter much. Of course, I'll
be the first to let you know if I'm wrong and suddenly have to unsubscribe
hundreds of people, but my own postings to announce usually produce 0-handful
of unsubscribe requests.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200610292032
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFFRVZXvJuQZxSWSsgRAtRMAKD6LuFRYVfZHxF9CHbdoCAXzDDrJgCgrk2o
CjNm5i1Hjo3RY9iCZGztm7s=
=LOpi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2006-10-30 14:34:48 beta.linuxports.com?
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2006-10-29 21:16:40 Re: Proposal for change in pgsql-announce behavior