Re: Fix performance of generic atomics

From: Sokolov Yura <funny(dot)falcon(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fix performance of generic atomics
Date: 2017-09-06 12:21:04
Message-ID: 10b4ca44e7356eea73902363f2a85f3f@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-09-06 14:54, Sokolov Yura wrote:
> On 2017-09-06 07:23, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> What scale factor and client count? How many cores per socket? It
>>> looks
>>> like Sokolov was just starting to see gains at 200 clients on 72
>>> cores,
>>> using -N transaction.
>> This means that Sokolov's proposed changes in atomics/generic.h
>> ought to be uninteresting for performance on any platform we care
>> about --- at
>> least for pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32().
>
> May I cite you this way:

I apologize for tone of my previous message.
My tongue is my enemy.

--
Sokolov Yura aka funny_falcon
Postgres Professional: https://postgrespro.ru
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-09-06 12:25:56 Re: document and use SPI_result_code_string()
Previous Message Jeevan Ladhe 2017-09-06 12:20:10 Re: Adding support for Default partition in partitioning