Re: 2019-03 CF Summary / Review - Tranche #2

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Subject: Re: 2019-03 CF Summary / Review - Tranche #2
Date: 2019-02-18 17:07:29
Message-ID: 10a6be40-e5bd-b8c4-481b-dda17a54471c@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/18/19 7:03 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2019-02-18 18:59:22 +0200, David Steele wrote:
>> On 2/16/19 7:45 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
>>
>>> - Add timeline to partial WAL segments
>>>
>>> WOA: Seems to need a good bit more work, and touches sensitive bits.
>>>
>>> Andres: +0.5 for punting to v13
>> I have labelled this patch v13 and I'll push it as soon as the CF app allows
>> me to do so.
>>
>> I think this is important but there is a lot of tricky work to be done in
>> pg_receivewal and it's best not to rush that. Michael and I have an
>> agreement in principle but ...
>
> FWIW, given that we now can filter by targetting v12 (although it'd be
> nice if it were possible to filter by v12 or NULL), I don't think
> there's any urgency to push to the next CF immediately.

Agreed. This new feature helps a lot.

Even so, I'll push it when I can to get it out of my hair, as it were.
I'll be spending a lot of time look at that list next month.

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2019-02-18 17:12:36 Re: WAL insert delay settings
Previous Message Andres Freund 2019-02-18 17:03:11 Re: 2019-03 CF Summary / Review - Tranche #2