From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Subject: | Re: 2019-03 CF Summary / Review - Tranche #2 |
Date: | 2019-02-18 17:07:29 |
Message-ID: | 10a6be40-e5bd-b8c4-481b-dda17a54471c@pgmasters.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/18/19 7:03 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2019-02-18 18:59:22 +0200, David Steele wrote:
>> On 2/16/19 7:45 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
>>
>>> - Add timeline to partial WAL segments
>>>
>>> WOA: Seems to need a good bit more work, and touches sensitive bits.
>>>
>>> Andres: +0.5 for punting to v13
>> I have labelled this patch v13 and I'll push it as soon as the CF app allows
>> me to do so.
>>
>> I think this is important but there is a lot of tricky work to be done in
>> pg_receivewal and it's best not to rush that. Michael and I have an
>> agreement in principle but ...
>
> FWIW, given that we now can filter by targetting v12 (although it'd be
> nice if it were possible to filter by v12 or NULL), I don't think
> there's any urgency to push to the next CF immediately.
Agreed. This new feature helps a lot.
Even so, I'll push it when I can to get it out of my hair, as it were.
I'll be spending a lot of time look at that list next month.
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2019-02-18 17:12:36 | Re: WAL insert delay settings |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2019-02-18 17:03:11 | Re: 2019-03 CF Summary / Review - Tranche #2 |