Re: Testing autovacuum wraparound (including failsafe)

> On 28 Nov 2023, at 03:00, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 10:40 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>>
>>> On 27 Nov 2023, at 14:06, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> Is it true that we can modify the timeout after creating
>>> BackgroundPsql object? If so, it seems we don't need to introduce the
>>> new timeout argument. But how?
>>
>> I can't remember if that's leftovers that incorrectly remains from an earlier
>> version of the BackgroundPsql work, or if it's a very bad explanation of
>> ->set_query_timer_restart(). The timeout will use the timeout_default value
>> and that cannot be overridden, it can only be reset per query.
>
> Thank you for confirming this. I see there is the same problem also in
> interactive_psql(). So I've attached the 0001 patch to fix these
> documentation issues.

-A default timeout of $PostgreSQL::Test::Utils::timeout_default is set up,
-which can be modified later.
+A default timeout of $PostgreSQL::Test::Utils::timeout_default is set up.

Since it cannot be modified, I think we should just say "A timeout of .." and
call it a default timeout. This obviously only matters for the backpatch since
the sentence is removed in 0002.

> Which could be backpatched.

+1

>> With your patch the timeout still cannot be changed, but at least set during
>> start which seems good enough until there are tests warranting more complexity.
>> The docs should be corrected to reflect this in your patch.
>
> I've incorporated the comments except for the following one and
> attached updated version of the rest patches:

LGTM.

--
Daniel Gustafsson