Tea,
Does the data actually go in the partitioned table, and if so can you
send us a test case.
The driver is just reporting the result code from the backend so ???
Dave
On 6-Dec-05, at 5:45 AM, Tea Yu wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> The scenario is quite simple - insert into a partitioned table in
> which a
> rule forwards the insertion into an inherited partition
> (Postgresql 8.1)
>
> However, JDBC returns 0 during Statement.executeUpdate(sql). It
> behaves
> normally when partition rule is removed.
>
> It applies to the following driver builds:
> 8.1 Build 404 (all JDBC ver)
> 8.2 dev Bulid 500 (all JDBC ver)
>
> Any clues? Thanks much!
>
> Tea
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>