| From: | Markus Bertheau <twanger(at)bluetwanger(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Mitch Pirtle <mitch(dot)pirtle(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal |
| Date: | 2004-10-29 16:34:29 |
| Message-ID: | 1099067668.2634.2.camel@teetnang |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
В Птн, 29.10.2004, в 09:52, Dave Page пишет:
> Which is why we investigated CMSs in depths before we started, and found
> that even advanced ones such as Bricolage couldn't meet our requirements
> :-(.
In view of the fact that the current site does (probably) not only not
meet your requirements, but also doesn't meet the perceived needs of the
web site's users, wouldn't it be wise to adjust your requirements so
that bricolage or plone or whatever fit, in order to get something
going?
Thanks
--
Markus Bertheau <twanger(at)bluetwanger(dot)de>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2004-10-29 16:50:46 | Re: [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal |
| Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2004-10-29 09:40:45 | Re: perceived absence of work on website |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2004-10-29 16:50:46 | Re: [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal |
| Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2004-10-29 09:40:45 | Re: perceived absence of work on website |