Re:

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
To: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL-Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re:
Date: 2004-10-26 20:44:10
Message-ID: 1098823450.2643.3.camel@fuji.krosing.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On T, 2004-10-26 at 14:02, Bernd Helmle wrote:

> - gram.y is only an ugly hack to get the CHECK OPTION working. needs deeper
> efforts, because it makes WITH a reserved keyword....

IMHO it should be a reserved keyword. I once wrangled to fit ANSI SQL
recursive queries into postgres grammar and the only way I could do that
also forced me to make WITH a reserved keyword.

Thus I think that reserved keyword is what it is meant to be in the
first place ;)

----------
Hannu

In response to

  • at 2004-10-26 11:02:27 from Bernd Helmle

Responses

  • Re: at 2004-10-28 15:16:50 from Bernd Helmle

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Wong 2004-10-26 20:52:06 DBT-3 Query 2 EXPLAIN ANALYZE differences
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-10-26 19:41:08 Re: timestamp with time zone a la sql99