Re: The reasoning behind having several features outside

From: Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org>
To: nd02tsk(at)student(dot)hig(dot)se
Cc: PgSQL General List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: The reasoning behind having several features outside
Date: 2004-10-25 19:45:19
Message-ID: 1098733519.6589.18.camel@jeff
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Other people have answered, but I'd like to add:

It makes it much faster to fix bugs and improve features in the projects
outside of the source tree. If replication has a bug, you don't want to
wait for the next point release, you want a fix *now*. PostgreSQL is a
big project, and can't make new point releases every time a bug appears
in a small subsystem.

To make an analogy, imagine if you had to wait for a new release of your
operating system to fix a bug in an SSL library?

Regards,
Jeff Davis

On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 20:19 +0200, nd02tsk(at)student(dot)hig(dot)se wrote:
> Hello
>
> Why is it that PostgreSQL chooses to have features like replication,
> fulltext indexing and GIS maintained by others outside of the sourcetree?
>
> I appreciate any answers.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Tim
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
--
Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2004-10-25 19:45:40 Re: PgSQL MVCC vs MySQL InnoDB
Previous Message Franco Bruno Borghesi 2004-10-25 19:33:33 Re: ON DELETE trigger blocks delete from my table