Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SQL 2003 conformance

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SQL 2003 conformance
Date: 2004-10-18 01:10:24
Message-ID: 1098061824.22986.91.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docs
On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 03:52, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Is anyone feeling masochistic and wants to review the SQL standards 
> conformance chapter in the documentation for SQL 2003?

Another useful improvement would be to update the "Standards
conformance" section of the SQL command reference pages to refer to
SQL:2003 consistently. At present they refer to a mix of SQL-92,
SQL:1999, and SQL:2003.


In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-10-18 02:06:43
Subject: Re: SQL 2003 conformance
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-10-15 16:53:01
Subject: Re: Some developer FAQ links need updating

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group