| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Marina Polyakova <m(dot)polyakova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "Victor Wagner *EXTERN*" <vitus(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: master make check fails on Solaris 10 |
| Date: | 2018-01-18 18:28:16 |
| Message-ID: | 10980.1516300096@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Anyway, that's really an academic debate. My real point is: I do not
> think we should reject out of hand the idea that a patch introducing
> some new notation to deal with this might be acceptable. I am not
> volunteering to write such a patch, and anyone who tries should be
> aware that there is a chance that it will be rejected on grounds of
> ugliness. However, if they decide to try anyway, we should read the
> patch and see how ugly it really is. Maybe it's not that bad.
Sure. I'm not intending to write such a patch either.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2018-01-18 18:30:46 | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation) |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2018-01-18 18:27:39 | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation) |