From: | Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | DEHAINSALA Hondjack <hondjack(dot)dehainsala(at)ensma(dot)fr> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL v8 NAMEDATALEn >=128 |
Date: | 2004-10-12 18:58:52 |
Message-ID: | 1097607532.1520.2214.camel@Andrea.peacock.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
Am Di, den 12.10.2004 schrieb DEHAINSALA Hondjack um 20:43:
> Hi !
> sorry for my english ! I am french :-)
>
> I want to test postgreSQL v8 native Windows! Where i can get a version
> which
> allows more than 64 characters (NAMEDATALEN ~=128) to the name of
> tables and
> columns ?
>
> I generate automaticly tables and the length of some of these tables
> is > to
> 64.
I wonder what could be the reason to do so? Is it kind of an
ORM (object relational mapper)?
> I use Postgresql 7.5 that I have recompiled the source after to have
> modified the NAMEDATALEN to 128!
> The server is very slow (ex. a query to table which contain 16.000
> instances
> take 1 munite). I don't know exactely why ?
> Someone think that the emulateur cygwin is responsible and they
> recommend me
> to install a postreSQL windows version.
> Personally I think it may a problem of conguration of the server and
> a
> tuning could increase performance.
Most of the time some indices here and there help :-)
You should have some example queries you find slow
and use EXPLAIN or EXPLAIN ANALYZE with them.
You can post the output here if you need help.
Regards
Tino
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2004-10-12 19:06:49 | Re: Message-ID as unique key? |
Previous Message | Steven Klassen | 2004-10-12 18:49:02 | Re: data dir permissions and ownership |