Re: AlterUserStmt anmd RoleSpec rules in grammar.y

From: Pavel Golub <pavel(at)microolap(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavel Golub <pavel(at)microolap(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Sandeep Thakkar <sandeep(dot)thakkar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Hamid Quddus <hamid(dot)quddus(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: AlterUserStmt anmd RoleSpec rules in grammar.y
Date: 2017-08-01 12:42:05
Message-ID: 1097322327.20170801154205@gf.microolap.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello, Robert.

Sorry, if I was rough. My English is not so excellent. My point is
that I was trying to distinguish behavior of EDB installer and
"build from source" PG.

And the result is that EDB executes ALTER USER and I don't know why.

You wrote:

RH> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:52 AM, Pavel Golub <pavel(at)microolap(dot)com> wrote:
>> One more notice. ALTER USER ALL works in EnterpriseDB 10beta2
>> installer. That's weird. I thought EnterpriseDB uses official sources.

RH> I find it really hard to believe that we're doing anything else. It
RH> wouldn't make any sense to patch the PostgreSQL source code and then
RH> release the installers as PostgreSQL installers. And if we *were*
RH> going to do that, wouldn't we patch something more interesting than
RH> the ALTER USER command? I don't know what's going on here but I have
RH> a feeling that EnterpriseDB secretly maintaining patch sets that we
RH> inject into our PostgreSQL installers is not that thing.

RH> Adding a few EDB people.

--
With best wishes,
Pavel mailto:pavel(at)gf(dot)microolap(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stas Kelvich 2017-08-01 13:15:01 Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
Previous Message Victor Wagner 2017-08-01 12:28:06 Re: PostgreSQL 10 (latest beta) and older ICU