Re: Discussion on missing optimizations

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Adam Brusselback <adambrusselback(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Discussion on missing optimizations
Date: 2017-10-08 15:28:09
Message-ID: 10968.1507476489@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Adam Brusselback <adambrusselback(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On another note:
>> turning ORs into UNIONs

> This is another one which would be incredibly useful for me. I've had
> to do this manually for performance reasons far too often.

Well, maybe you could sign up to help review the open patch for that then:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/15/1001/

The reason that's not in v10 is we haven't been able to convince
ourselves whether it's 100% correct.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-10-08 16:18:04 Re: Discussion on missing optimizations
Previous Message Adam Brusselback 2017-10-08 15:17:01 Re: Discussion on missing optimizations