Re: pg_plan_advice

From: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_plan_advice
Date: 2026-03-19 20:12:32
Message-ID: 1095d3fe-a6eb-4d83-866e-649d6f369908@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 19/03/26 14:17, Robert Haas wrote:
> Before I forget, another idea that might help is to see if we can
> tweak meson.build to start running this particular test earlier. I
> thought about that during development, but I didn't actually do it. If
> the issue is that test being last to finish, that could help. If the
> issue is total resource consumption, it won't help with that.
>
We can add a 'priority' for the test:

'tap': {
'tests': [
't/001_replan_regress.pl',
],
+ 'test_kwargs': {'priority': 50},
},

Even if it's not help with resource consumption I think that it still
worth adding. It reduces from ~5m to ~4m on my machine.

--
Matheus Alcantara
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2026-03-19 20:14:41 Re: pg_get__*_ddl consolidation
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2026-03-19 20:11:14 Re: Bug in MultiXact replay compat logic for older minor version after crash-recovery