| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: minimum Meson version |
| Date: | 2025-06-18 16:27:44 |
| Message-ID: | 1095967.1750264064@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 9:35 AM Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> wrote:
>> And what I just don't understand about this whole discussion:
> What I just don't understand about this discussion is a bunch of smart
> people thinking that a bunch of other smart people have completely
> lost their minds, while the second group thinks exactly the same about
> the first group. There's hardly a topic to be found that produces more
> apparent acrimony around here than what releases of things we ought to
> still be supporting.
Indeed. I think the compromise we've usually settled on is "we'll
support release X as long as there's somebody willing to do the work".
If it's not costing you personally any effort, why object to someone
else wanting to spend effort on such things?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2025-06-18 16:31:50 | Re: Fixes inconsistent behavior in vacuum when it processes multiple relations |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2025-06-18 16:17:16 | Re: minimum Meson version |