| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: Press Release, Final Draft? | 
| Date: | 2004-09-23 13:02:08 | 
| Message-ID: | 1095944528.1654.89.camel@camel | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy | 
On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 23:21, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Peter,
> > PostgreSQL is available under a BSD-style license, which imposes no
> > restrictions on commercial or noncommercial redistribution and use.
> 
> well, gramatically it's:
> PostgreSQL is available under a BSD-style license, which imposes restrictions 
> on neither commercial nor noncommercial redistribution and use.  
>
Is it? Thats a mouthful. And technically not true, since there is a
restriction, which is that you must keep the copyright notices in tact.
How about "which imposes no penalties for commercial or non-commercial
use."
 
> I also question the need for "-style".    Last I checked, we were using *the* 
> BSD license.
> 
Well, were not use *the* BSD license, since our version is not the most
current. However I do think that adding the "-style" will only confuse
people, so I am all for leaving it out since afaik we are using *a* BSD
license. 
BTW - On the web page we call it a licence.
Robert Treat
-- 
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2004-09-23 13:16:27 | Re: Press Release, Final Draft? | 
| Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2004-09-23 11:03:42 | Re: Press Release, Final Draft? |