| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: problem with RETURNING and update row movement |
| Date: | 2021-04-22 15:49:10 |
| Message-ID: | 1094443.1619106550@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I think we should also add slot != srcSlot to this condition.
Good idea, should save useless comparisons of identical tupdescs.
Done.
>> (I've not looked at porting this to v12 or v11 yet.)
> I did that; patches attached. (I haven't changed them to incorporate
> the above comment though.)
Thanks for that, saved me some work. I've pushed these.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2021-04-22 16:15:27 | Re: decoupling table and index vacuum |
| Previous Message | Mark Dilger | 2021-04-22 15:46:09 | Re: multi-install PostgresNode fails with older postgres versions |