|From:||Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>|
|To:||Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>|
|Cc:||Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: [bug fix] Produce a crash dump before main() on Windows|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 06:03:08PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> I had to go hunt around with Dependency Walker to figure out the actual
>> missing DLL the last time I had to deal with this.
> Ahah. Yes, That's exactly what I used a couple of years back on that.
> These errors are hard to track and find.
I feel the pain on this --- indirect dependencies are not well reported
on any platform that I deal with :-(. Still, I'm having a hard time
convincing myself that this patch is a good idea. It seems very likely
that it will break some startup scenarios, and the incremental benefit
in error reporting seems marginal.
regards, tom lane
|Next Message||Tomas Vondra||2019-11-10 17:33:30||Re: Using multiple extended statistics for estimates|
|Previous Message||Dmitry Dolgov||2019-11-10 12:32:08||Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting|