| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Marc Fournier <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] aclchk.c refactor |
| Date: | 2005-12-01 15:28:34 |
| Message-ID: | 10931.1133450914@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches pgsql-www |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> I applied this patch yesterday, but I did not receive the commit
> message. However I do see it in the online archives.
> Is there something fishy going on here, or just the mail was lost on its
> way here?
[ checks mail logs... ] Hm, I never got a copy of this either:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2005-11/msg00609.php
There's definitely something flaky about pgsql-committers since the
server move. I still haven't seen anything about Michael's ecpg commits
of yesterday, either.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-01 15:38:45 | Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-01 15:07:31 | Re: [PATCHES] A couple of proposed pgbench changes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2005-12-01 15:49:14 | Re: [PATCHES] aclchk.c refactor |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-12-01 13:36:29 | Re: aclchk.c refactor |