Re: reply to setting

From: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, Kenneth Gonsalves <lawgon(at)thenilgiris(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: reply to setting
Date: 2004-08-11 21:18:35
Message-ID: 1092259114.16087.80.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

> > faster than ones sent through the lists. It is also possible that the direct
> > replies might be handled differently by the recipient (e.g. a filter may put
> > them in different folders).
>
> This is very true. In fact, I get mildly annoyed when people *don't*
> include the direct reply to me, because I very actively filter/redirect

If you don't want duplicates, send an email to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
with the following command (or something similar to this anyway):

set pgsql-hackers eliminatecc

Whenever you're in the To: or Cc: headers, the list will not send you a
copy of the message -- so you only receive it once.

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2004-08-11 22:18:59 Re: Wierded error in recursive function; debugging ideas?
Previous Message Joe Conway 2004-08-11 20:45:21 Re: reply to setting