Re: Inherited tables and new fields

From: Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Jeff Boes <jboes(at)qtm(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Inherited tables and new fields
Date: 2004-07-21 07:11:27
Message-ID: 1090393887.25749.164.camel@linda
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 15:36, Jeff Boes wrote:
...
> Of course, had we used table inheritance, we'd do something like ...
>
> select * from draft_template ...
>
> but it wouldn't do exactly what we are doing now: that is,
> fn_all_drafts() returns not only the contents of every row in the tables
> draft_XXXXX, but also an extra column indicating which table that row
> came from.

You can do that with an inheritance hierarchy like this:

select tableoid::regclass as tablename, * from my_table;

> create table all_drafts (editor_id integer) inherits draft_template;
>
> What frustrates me from time to time is that if "draft_template" is
> altered to add a new column, then the function breaks because the new
> column appears in "all_drafts" as *following* editor_id. The column
> order messes up the code in the function, because it's expecting
> all_drafts to look like draft_template, with editor_id added at the end.
>
> Is this a mis-feature?

New columns get added at the end of each table; that is standard.

--
Oliver Elphick olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/A54310EA 92C8 39E7 280E 3631 3F0E 1EC0 5664 7A2F A543 10EA
========================================
"Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay
down his life for his friends." John 15:13

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-07-21 07:30:17 Re: surrogate key or not?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-07-21 07:00:59 Re: surrogate key or not?