| From: | Markus Bertheau <twanger(at)bluetwanger(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Perry Smith <pedz(at)easesoftware(dot)net>, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: US-ASCII on Mac OS X |
| Date: | 2004-07-21 06:47:40 |
| Message-ID: | 1090392459.2745.1.camel@teetnang |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-ports |
В Втр, 20.07.2004, в 23:39, Peter Eisentraut пишет:
> Perry Smith wrote:
> > Is any code page like iso-8859-1 or IBM850 different in the range
> > that US-ASCII covers (from 0x00 to 0x7f)? If that is the case, then
> > gnucash could change US-ASCII to practically anything.
>
> Considering the character repertoire (i.e., that abstract set of
> characters provided), then US ASCII is a subset of most character
> repertoires. But considering the encoding (i.e., the binary
> representation of the characters), then it is not a subset of most
> encodings (e.g., not of UTF-8)
Where's the incompatibility here? I always thought UTF-8 was binary
compatible with ASCII for characters in ASCII.
--
Markus Bertheau <twanger(at)bluetwanger(dot)de>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-07-21 07:26:38 | Re: US-ASCII on Mac OS X |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-07-20 21:39:49 | Re: US-ASCII on Mac OS X |