Re: pg_dump bug fixing

From: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump bug fixing
Date: 2004-07-19 17:01:43
Message-ID: 1090256502.414.17.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 12:36, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Rod,
>
> > I think what we want is a clean template without all of the extras that
> > template1 has.
>
> We have this, it's called Template0.

Doesn't work for me. I remove a number of things that are included by
default in template0, but yes, it's close.

> Actually, KL, that would solve a lot of these duplicate object problems. What
> if pg_restore used Template0 and not Template1? It wouldn't fix the "drop
> public schema" issue but it would solve the others.

Remove the public schema from template0, but leave it in template1. Have
pg_dump treat the public schema the same as all of the other ones.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-07-19 17:30:21 Re: pg_dump bug fixing
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-07-19 16:56:04 Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery