| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Residual cleanups for tied objects in PL/Perl |
| Date: | 2026-08-17 18:44:26 |
| Message-ID: | 108ad484-2578-482b-81e4-a5f1f9749062@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2026-08-16 Su 5:10 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 2026-08-16 Su 3:04 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>>> On 2026-08-16 Su 1:38 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> The test cases I have that reach these bugs require Perl "Tie"
>>>> modules that aren't present in common Perl installations,
>>>> so I'm not planning on trying to construct regression test
>>>> entries for them. But I've attached two SQL scripts that
>>>> cause failures without the patch.
>>> Which modules?
>> At least Tie::Array isn't present in RHEL10's standard perl
>> package set --- I had to install "perl-Tie" to get that test
>> case to run here.
>
>
> That seems odd, given that we use Tie::Hash and Tie::StdHash in
> src/pl/plperl/plc_trusted.pl
>
>
Answering myself, it appears that those are part of RHEL10's perl-libs
package, while Tie::Array and Tie::StdArray are part of the perl-Tie
package. That seems at first glance like a really awful packaging
decision, something not entirely without precedent.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2026-08-17 18:58:07 | Re: Residual cleanups for tied objects in PL/Perl |
| Previous Message | Andrey Rachitskiy | 2026-08-17 18:41:05 | Re: Fix PGTYPESdate_fmt_asc overflow when a year does not fit "yyyy" |