| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)coretech(dot)co(dot)nz> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Point in Time Recovery |
| Date: | 2004-07-16 00:02:38 |
| Message-ID: | 1089936157.17493.6958.camel@stromboli |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 00:46, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>
> By way of contrast, using the *same* procedure (1-11), but generating 2
> logs worth of INSERTS/UPDATES using 10 concurrent process *works fine* -
> e.g :
>
Great...at least we have shown that something works (or can work) and
have begun to isolate the problem whatever it is.
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-16 03:49:04 | Re: Point in Time Recovery |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2004-07-15 23:51:53 | Re: Point in Time Recovery |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oliver Jowett | 2004-07-16 00:17:54 | Re: Very strange Error in Updates |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-15 23:59:20 | Re: Very strange Error in Updates |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-16 03:39:47 | Re: initdb authentication |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2004-07-15 23:51:53 | Re: Point in Time Recovery |