Re: Postgresql on SAN

From: Yannick Lecaillez <yl(at)itioweb(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql on SAN
Date: 2004-07-07 10:39:34
Message-ID: 1089196774.1888.122.camel@yannick.vivaxe.lan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thanks a lot for all people which answer.

I have this "clustering on SAN" problem today and i think it could be
less harder to implement this today than it was for Oracle in 1993
(since i can find a lot of work in opensource which could be interesting
in this project : distributed lock, clustered shared memory, etc ...).

I will try to have a look about all these things btw, i haven't got
the pretention to suceed to do anything ... Just look and see
a bit more deeply how it could be hard.

Is there something like a "big picture" about postgres internal ?
What path is used from the SQL query to the hard-disk files ? About
the internal locking mechanism ? about the usage of the shared memory ?
I see there is everything described in the postgres doc but no "big
picture" which could help me to understand faster ... :(

I'm using postgres for several year and i have nerver problem with
it i'm really happy with these trigger and inheritance mechanism which
help me more than one time and i would present my respect to those guy
which write this so good piece of software.

I hope to see you later with something to show ...

Sincerly, Yannick.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Jowett 2004-07-07 10:58:06 Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All
Previous Message Dennis Bjorklund 2004-07-07 09:26:45 Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All