Re: iODBC vs unixODBC

Here's the basic problem. See my post from June 18 for more details.

When I use the unixODBC drivers isql also goes away eating
CPU, however I get the following in my postgresql logfile:
2004-06-16 11:10:04 LOG: unexpected EOF within message length word

On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 01:31, Stergios Zissakis wrote:
> What is the problem with unixODBC? I got it working on Solaris 8 quite
> easily.
> Send me details on where it goes wrong. I might be able to help.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Jon Schewe
> Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 11:59 PM
> To: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [ODBC] iODBC vs unixODBC
>
>
> I've been trying to get unixODBC to work with PostgreSQL 7.4.2 with no
> luck. After doing some more looking I see that iODBC exists as well.
> Are there any reasons to choose on over the other? The only things I've
> noticed are that it appears there are more unixODBC drivers than iODBC
> drivers and that SuSE is no longer shipping iODBC.
>
> I did read the thread on iODBC and unixODBC from September of 2001, but
> haven't seen much since then.
>
> --
> Jon Schewe | http://mtu.net/~jpschewe
> GPG signature at http://mtu.net/~jpschewe/gpg.sig.html
> For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels
> nor demons, neither the present nor the future, nor any
> powers, neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all
> creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that
> is in Christ Jesus our Lord. - Romans 8:38-39
--
Jon Schewe | http://mtu.net/~jpschewe
GPG signature at http://mtu.net/~jpschewe/gpg.sig.html
For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels
nor demons, neither the present nor the future, nor any
powers, neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all
creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that
is in Christ Jesus our Lord. - Romans 8:38-39