Re: Coding help

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Coding help
Date: 2003-11-10 01:47:03
Message-ID: 10885.1068428823@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> It occurs to me then that I could just then use FloatOnly in the grammar

I don't think so, unless you are proposing something very odd in the
lexer to force it to treat an integer literal as a float in this one
context.

What is the problem with following the lead of the existing code?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kris Jurka 2003-11-10 01:59:02 Re: Setting client encoding with jdbc
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-11-10 01:44:40 Re: Coding help