"Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> What optimization level do you use? Do you find that the newer version
> of egcs does a good job with floating point rounding, or are the
> regression tests filled with ".999999" results? I much preferred the
> gcc-2.7.x behavior wrt graceful rounding, and hope that at some point
> egcs will also have it...
Are you sure you are right to blame the compiler? I should think this
would be a C library issue, not the compiler's fault...
regards, tom lane