Re: Possible changes to pg_restore

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: hywel(at)hmallett(dot)co(dot)uk
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Possible changes to pg_restore
Date: 2010-01-26 00:01:41
Message-ID: 10854.1264464101@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

<hywel(at)hmallett(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> Would it be possible and worthwhile to add functionality to pg_restore so
> that with one switch triggers/indexes/constraints could be ignored, and
> with another switch only triggers/indexes/constraints would be restored?

You should probably go back and look at the archives from the last
go-round on that. I believe it was during the 8.4 devel cycle.
Somebody (might have been Simon, but not sure) submitted a patch for
three-part output from pg_dump, it was discussed and sent back for
revision, and the revision never materialized :-(. But IIRC there
was reasonably clear consensus on what the feature ought to look like.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2010-01-26 00:08:54 Re: Dividing progress/debug information in pg_standby, and stat before copy
Previous Message KaiGai Kohei 2010-01-25 23:52:00 Re: RADIUS authentication