Re: order by index, and inheritance

From: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Michiel Meeuwissen <Michiel(dot)Meeuwissen(at)omroep(dot)nl>
Cc: performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: order by index, and inheritance
Date: 2004-04-22 14:46:40
Message-ID: 1082645200.91360.24.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


> This indeeds performs good (about 10000 times faster then select number,url
> from mm_mediasources order by number desc limit 20) . But hardly beautiful,
> and quite useless too because of course I am now going to want to use an
> offset (limit 20 offset 20, you see..), which seems more or less impossible
> in this way, isn't it.

Yes, and the offset is a good reason why PostgreSQL will not be able to
do it by itself either.

Is "number" unique across the board?

If so, instead of the offset you could use WHERE number > $lastValue.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-04-22 15:54:48 Re: [PERFORM] MySQL vs PG TPC-H benchmarks
Previous Message Michiel Meeuwissen 2004-04-22 14:40:23 Re: order by index, and inheritance