From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Implement targetlist SRFs using ROWS FROM() (was Changed SRF in targetlist handling) |
Date: | 2017-01-18 21:56:46 |
Message-ID: | 1080.1484776606@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> There's one sgml comment you'd added:
> "Furthermore, nested set-returning functions did not work at all."
> I'm not quite sure what you're referring to there - it was previously
> allowed to have one set argument to an SRF:
Ooops ... that was composed too hastily, evidently. Will fix.
I'll try to write something about the SRF-in-CASE issue too. Seeing
whether we can document that adequately seems like an important part
of making the decision about whether we need to block it.
> Working on rebasing the cleanup patch now. Interested in reviewing
> that? Otherwise I think I'll just push the rebased version of what I'd
> posted before, after making another pass through it.
I have not actually looked at 0003 at all yet. So yeah, please post
for review after you're done rebasing.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Rowley | 2017-01-18 22:06:14 | Re: Performance improvement for joins where outer side is unique |
Previous Message | Karl O. Pinc | 2017-01-18 21:56:16 | Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function |