| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: automatically generating node support functions |
| Date: | 2022-07-11 14:22:59 |
| Message-ID: | 1079552.1657549379@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On 11.07.22 01:09, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The rest could probably be alphabetical. I was also wondering if
>> all of them really need to be read at all --- I'm unclear on what
>> access/sdir.h is contributing, for example.
> could not handle type "ScanDirection" in struct "IndexScan" field
> "indexorderdir"
Ah, I see. Still, we could also handle that with
push @enum_types, qw(ScanDirection);
which would be exactly one place that needs to know about this, rather
than the three (soon to be four) places that know that access/sdir.h
needs to be read and then mostly ignored.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sergey Dudoladov | 2022-07-11 14:43:12 | Re: Add connection active, idle time to pg_stat_activity |
| Previous Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2022-07-11 14:22:41 | Re: doc: Bring mention of unique index forced transaction wait behavior outside of the internal section |