Re: are there any cons to linking libstdc++ with postgresql?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)pingpong(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: are there any cons to linking libstdc++ with postgresql?
Date: 2004-11-18 01:49:20
Message-ID: 10779.1100742560@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)pingpong(dot)net> writes:
>> Is there a penalty in just leaving
>> LDFLAGS+= -lstdc++
>> in the postgresql port Makefile? Bad idea?

Yup. The portability hazards are considerable. I'm a bit surprised the
postgis guys seem to think it works.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Harry Smith 2004-11-18 03:01:45 Usenet Discussion Proposal
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-11-18 01:44:53 Re: Tired of -Wold-style-definition already