| From: | Markus Bertheau <twanger(at)bluetwanger(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Cc: | Eric Jain <Eric(dot)Jain(at)isb-sib(dot)ch>, pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Slow join using network address function |
| Date: | 2004-02-24 01:23:27 |
| Message-ID: | 1077585807.2258.0.camel@yarrow.bertheau.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Пнд, 2004-02-23 at 12:04 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Eric,
>
> > Nested Loop
> > (cost=189.00..27359887.76 rows=607947200 width=22)
> > Join Filter: ("outer".address <<= "inner".address)
> > -> Seq Scan on clients c
> > (cost=0.00..2074.76 rows=102176 width=11)
> > -> Materialize
> > (cost=189.00..308.00 rows=11900 width=11)
> > -> Seq Scan on clients_commercial cc
> > (cost=0.00..189.00 rows=11900 width=11)
>
> To help you, we need EXPLAIN ANALYZE, not just EXPLAIN. Thanks!
He said he cancelled the query.
--
Markus Bertheau <twanger(at)bluetwanger(dot)de>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ed L. | 2004-02-24 02:10:57 | [PERFORMANCE] slow small delete on large table |
| Previous Message | Sean Shanny | 2004-02-24 00:54:07 | Re: General performance questions about postgres on Apple |