| From: | Austin Gonyou <austin(at)coremetrics(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PITR Dead horse? |
| Date: | 2004-02-05 16:38:29 |
| Message-ID: | 1075999109.3135.2.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-pitr |
Wow. What a wonderful response. Thanks all!
On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 08:57, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > > Has this been beaten to death now? Just curious if PITR was in Dev tree
> > > yet. Been out of the loop. TIA.
> >
> > I and my co workers are very interested in implementing PITR. We will
> > tackle this for 7.5 if no one objects.
>
> I have put up a PITR project page:
>
> http://momjian.postgresql.org/main/writings/pgsql/project
--
Austin Gonyou <austin(at)coremetrics(dot)com>
Coremetrics, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nicolai Tufar | 2004-02-05 17:34:55 | Re: PITR Dead horse? |
| Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD | 2004-02-05 16:38:03 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chester Kustarz | 2004-02-05 20:45:19 | Re: PITR Dead horse? |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-02-05 15:57:12 | Re: PITR Dead horse? |