| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question | 
| Date: | 2004-01-27 13:10:32 | 
| Message-ID: | 1075209033.30531.22906.camel@camel | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 00:21, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >> AFAIK the only target build environment for Windows right now is MinGW/gcc
> >> 
> >> If anyone knows how to get the M$ compilers to work nicely with our build
> >> system that might be interesting, but probably at a later stage.
> 
> > MS C compiler usage would require gmake and a whole host of other stuff
> > that doesn't seem worth doing.
> 
> Um, good point.  Porting our Makefiles to anything but gmake seems
> completely out of the question.  So unless someone has a Windows build
> environment that has gmake but not gcc, this is moot.
> 
Tom, check out
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-ports/2004-01/msg00017.php
Looking at the interix website, they seem to have gmake but no gcc,
which seems to fit into your scenario above. Incedentally they do 
distribute a compiled PostgreSQL with their packages, though it's based
on 7.2 according to the author.  
Robert Treat 
-- 
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-01-27 13:51:30 | Re: returning PGresult as xml | 
| Previous Message | Scott Lamb | 2004-01-27 12:58:23 | Re: returning PGresult as xml |