Re: SCO Extortion

From: Stephen Robert Norris <srn(at)commsecure(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SCO Extortion
Date: 2004-01-21 03:05:14
Message-ID: 1074654314.20961.2.camel@ws12.commsecure.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 11:55, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Gavin M. Roy wrote:
>
> > I'm currently one of the targets of SCO's linux licensing extortion
> > business plan, and am contemplating switching to one of the BSD's to
> > avoid any potential problems. I'm curious which BSD people prefer for
> > large scale databases and why. Any pointers as to which I should test out?
>
> for the longest time, the BSDs have been split as:
>
> FreeBSD - i386 rock solid
> NetBSD - work on as many platforms as possible
> OpenBSD - be as secure as possible
>
> There is alot of code sharing between them all though, so, IMHO, alot of
> it is personal preferences ... I've been using FreeBSD since '95, and
> other then having a habit of finding (and, usually pushing) its limits,
> I've been most happy with it ...
>
>
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match

Of course SCO is planning to sue the BSD users, too, so it's not really
a solution.

Just ignore them :)

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-01-21 04:21:46 Re: SCO Extortion
Previous Message Gavin M. Roy 2004-01-21 02:16:46 Re: SCO Extortion