Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method
Date: 2005-08-09 00:29:34
Message-ID: 10741.1123547374@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> writes:
> Automated performance testing seems like a bad idea for the buildfarm.
> Consider in my particular case I've got three members that all happen to
> be running in virtual machines on the same host. What virtualization does
> for performance and what happens when all three members are running at the
> same time renders any results beyond useless.

Certainly a good point --- but as I noted to Andrew, we'd probably be
more interested in one-off tests than repetitive testing anyway. So
possibly this could be handled with a different protocol, and buildfarm
machine owners could be careful to schedule slots for such tests at
times when their machine is otherwise idle.

Anyway it all needs some thought ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-08-09 02:21:28 Re: prevent encoding conversion recursive error
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-08-09 00:22:20 Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method