Re: PL/Java issues

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PL/Java issues
Date: 2004-01-03 15:28:41
Message-ID: 1073143721.13960.73.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

Can you explain what you mean by this?

Dave
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 20:21, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Will we need to address this TODO item:
>
> . Add capability to create and call PROCEDURES
>
> before proceding to do PL/Java? It would add to the usefulness greatly,
> I should think. I'm not sure how hard it would be.
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
>
--
Dave Cramer
519 939 0336
ICQ # 1467551

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2004-01-03 16:12:05 Re: Postgres + Xapian (was Re: fulltext searching via a custom index type )
Previous Message Kurt Roeckx 2004-01-03 11:19:06 Re: time format

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-01-04 01:07:36 Re: PL/Java issues
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-01-03 06:34:43 Re: For Tom Lane