From: | Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | conny(dot)thimren(at)servit(dot)se |
Cc: | Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: general peformance question |
Date: | 2003-12-22 20:45:24 |
Message-ID: | 1072125923.17267.55.camel@jester |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 12:04, Conny Thimren wrote:
> Hi,
> This a kind of newbie-question. I've been using Postgres for a long time in a low transction environment - and it is great.
>
> Now I've got an inquiry for using Postgresql in a heavy-load on-line system. This system must handle something like 20 questions per sec with a response time at 1/10 sec. Each question will result in approx 5-6 reads and a couple of updates.
> Anybody have a feeling if this is realistic on a Intelbased Linux server with Postgresql. Ofcourse I know that this is too little info for an exact answer but - as I said - maybe someone can give a hint if it's possible. Maybe someone with heavy-load can give an example of what is possible...
Ok, is that 20 questions per second (20 in parallel taking 1 second
each) or serialized taking 50ms each.
Are they simple selects / updates (less than 10 rows in result set, very
simple joins) or are they monster 30 table join queries?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-12-22 21:11:25 | mnogosearch under 7.4 ... |
Previous Message | Michael Guerin | 2003-12-22 19:11:54 | postgresql performance on linux port |