Re: tablespaces in 7.5?

From: "Keith C(dot) Perry" <netadmin(at)vcsn(dot)com>
To: Mike Nolan <nolan(at)gw(dot)tssi(dot)com>
Cc: Brian Maguire <bmaguire(at)vantage(dot)com>, johnsw(at)wardbrook(dot)com, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: tablespaces in 7.5?
Date: 2003-12-13 21:24:29
Message-ID: 1071350669.3fdb838d82fca@webmail.vcsn.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Quoting Mike Nolan <nolan(at)gw(dot)tssi(dot)com>:

> > Ok, thats for the response. I take it a PG namespace = Oracle table space
> (or
> > namespace is simply the generic term). I can see some definite benefits
> > especially with disk i/o throughput though I thought database partitioning
> (I
> > think that is what its called) would provide the same thing.
>
> I could be wrong, but I think 'namespace' is an existing concept in
> PG that is a way of organizing objects into logical groups.
>
> As I recall, the group working on it decided to call it a 'directory' rather
>
> than a 'tablespace', because of concerns that the latter word might be
> proprietary to Oracle. I've lost touch with the rest of the members in
> that group, though, since the computer I was using for PG development
> purposes got zapped by lightning in August.
> --
> Mike Nolan
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>

I think that is what I was getting confused with before- schemas...

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/catalog-pg-namespace.html

--
Keith C. Perry, MS E.E.
Director of Networks & Applications
VCSN, Inc.
http://vcsn.com

____________________________________
This email account is being host by:
VCSN, Inc : http://vcsn.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message MT 2003-12-13 21:41:03 Re: Calculating total amounts per clientid
Previous Message Josué Maldonado 2003-12-13 21:17:00 Re: Why is postgres an ORDMS